Arthur Nagel vs Jip Van Assendelft Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Aug at 08:08 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Nagel vs J. Van Assendelft

FRA
0
Win
Played
0
Win

NED
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-To-Head: 0 - 0
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Nagel | 0 |
Assendelft | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
No past h2h event happened.
A. Nagel vs J. V. Assendelft H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
60.31% (79-52) | Career Total W/L | 50.79% (32-31) |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Nagel vs J. V. Assendelft Match Preview
- Assendelft wins 46.34% of points on their second serve lately, while Nagel wins 47.26%. Does a slight edge here give Nagel an advantage? Potentially.
- Regarding return games, Assendelft takes 49.56% of their opponent's second serve points, and Nagel is slightly ahead with 50.71%. For first serve returns, Assendelft manages 29.55%, while Nagel achieves 31.89%.
- Assendelft’s ability to save breakpoints stands at 54.29%, compared to Nagel's 49.21%. Could this give Assendelft an edge in critical moments? Quite possibly.
- In terms of match outcomes over the past year, Assendelft has a 75% win rate (6 wins and 2 losses), while Nagel has a 59.26% win rate (32 wins and 22 losses).
- Both players excel on Clay surfaces, with Assendelft winning 57% of those matches, and Nagel slightly better at 66%. Neither player shows favorable results on Indoor Hard courts, where Assendelft wins 40%, and Nagel performs at 55%.
- Concerning the level of competition, Assendelft's opponents average a rank of 146.63, whereas Nagel's average at 371.22, suggesting Assendelft has faced tougher opposition.
- If this match proceeds to a deciding set, Assendelft has a strong 80% success rate in such situations, surpassing Nagel's 57%.
- Historically, Nagel is more efficient at converting breakpoints at 42.31%, compared to Assendelft's 31.25%.
Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):
In an upcoming match set against the backdrop of nearly equal second serve efficiency, Nagel seems to have a modest advantage with slightly superior return stats and breakpoint conversion rates.
Assendelft, however, showcases a stronger record in saving breakpoints and has historically performed well against higher-ranked players. Moreover, their outstanding 80% success rate in deciding sets could be a crucial factor if the match extends.
While both players present strengths on Clay, which is their most favored surface, it appears Assendelft potentially faces stiffer competition.
Weighing these elements, Assendelft seems poised to likely secure a victory in this contest, although the match could be tightly contested.
Arthur Nagel vs Jip Van Assendelft Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Nagel Recent Matches Played
J. V. Assendelft Recent Matches Played

A. Nagel vs J. V. Assendelft Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1st Match | YTD Win/Loss | 50.79% (32/31) |
1st Match | Sets Win/Loss | 50.33% (76/75) |
1st Match | Games Win/Loss | 50.36% (766/755) |
1st Match | Hard Win/Loss | 47.62% (10/11) |
1st Match | Clay Win/Loss | 55.56% (20/16) |
1st Match | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
1st Match | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
1st Match | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
1st Match | Aces Total | 50 |
1st Match | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
1st Match | Total Double Faults | 131 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
1st Match | Average Opponent Rank | 192.17 |
1st Match | 1st Serve % | 61% (991/1618) |
1st Match | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (644/991) |
1st Match | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (297/627) |
1st Match | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (65/157) |
1st Match | Return Points Win % | 40% (642/1604) |
1st Match | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
1st Match | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
1st Match | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
1st Match | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
1st Match | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
1st Match | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
1st Match | Futures W/L | 50.79% (32/31) |
1st Match | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (32/63) |
1st Match | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
1st Match | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
1st Match | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (13/25) |
1st Match | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 74% (34/25) |
1st Match | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 26% (34/9) |
1st Match | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (29/7) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
